The mystery of consciousness has been one of the deepest and unsolved questions in neuroscience. It refers to our awareness of ourselves, our thoughts, and the world around us; however, describing how it arises from the complex neural activity of the brain is still quite a challenge. Much has been learned in neuroscience, but no brain area has been identified as the "seat" of consciousness, which supposedly results from interactions across many brain regions.
Contemporary theories of consciousness try to explain how neural activity gives rise to subjective experience: Global Workspace Theory posits that consciousness results from the sharing of information across different parts of the brain. Alternatively, Integrated Information Theory puts forward the idea that when the brain processes information in a highly integrated, unified manner, it gives rise to consciousness. Higher-order theories emphasize the capacity of the brain to reflect on its workings—and in this way, perhaps, to self-awareness.
Part of the problem here is what has come to be known as the "hard problem" of consciousness. While we can explain how the brain processes sensory input and map brain activity to certain states, we have no explanation as to why that activity gives rise to subjective experience—why it is that we see red or feel pain in the first place. That gap between neural activity and experience makes consciousness difficult to study in the first place.
Despite decades of research, consciousness remains elusive. Further insights may be forthcoming with advances in brain imaging and other technologies, but for the time being, how consciousness arises from neural processes continues to baffle scientists and philosophers alike. The search goes on to understand the nature of consciousness, one of the most captivating and mysterious aspects of the human brain.
You must be logged in to post a comment.